Why More Often Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus ...HOW ?

"Every Day And In Every Way I Am Getting Better And Better"...
.
.
.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18178393 = '... It is not currently clear why insulin auto-immunity is so prominent and frequent ...' = vaccination of beta-cells ?

HYPOglycemia risk c/o SUB6.5 HbA1c 'diagnostic' and/or Auto-immune stimulated vaccination of beta-cells & collateral vaccination of alpha-cells [& collateral consequential HYPOglycemia risk] c/o SUB7.35 pH non-human GM insulin ?Love-Diabetes.cOM? ...


J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 May 6. [Epub ahead of print]

Related Articles, Links

A New Look at Screening and Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus.

Saudek CD, Herman WH, Sacks DB, Bergenstal RM, Edelman D, Davidson MB.

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Internal Medicine, Charles R. Drew University, Los Angeles, CA.

Objective: Diabetes is under-diagnosed.

About one-third of people with diabetes do not know they have it, and the average lag between onset and diagnosis is 7 years.

This report reconsiders the criteria for diagnosing diabetes, and recommends screening criteria, in order to make case-finding easier for clinicians and patients.

Participants: One of us (RMB) invited experts in the area of diagnosis, monitoring and management of diabetes to form a panel to review the literature and develop consensus regarding the screening and diagnosis of diabetes with particular reference to the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

Participants met in open session and by email thereafter.

Metrika, Inc. sponsored the meeting.

Evidence: Literature search was performed using standard search engines.

Consensus Process: The panel heard each member's discussion of the issues, reviewing evidence prior to drafting conclusions. Principal conclusions were agreed upon, then specific cut-points were discussed in an iterative consensus process.


Conclusions: The main factors in support of using HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test include:

a) HbA1c does not require patients to be fasting;

b) HbA1c reflects longer-term glycemia than does plasma glucose;

c) HbA1c laboratory methods are now well standardized and reliable;

d) errors caused by non-glycemic factors affecting HbA1c such as hemoglobinopathies are infrequent and can be minimized by confirming the diagnosis of diabetes with a plasma glucose (PG)-specific test.


Specific recommendations:

1) Screening standards should be established that prompt further testing and closer follow-up, including fasting PG >/=100 mg/dl, random PG >/=130 mg/dl or HbA1c > 6.0%;

2) HbA1c >/= 6.5 - 6.9%, confirmed by a PG-specific test (FPG or OGTT), should establish the diagnosis of diabetes;

3) HbA1c >/= 7%, confirmed by another HbA1c or a PG-specific test (FPG or OGTT) should establish the diagnosis of diabetes.


The recommendations are offered for consideration of the clinical community and interested associations and societies.